Erica Schwartz, a former deputy surgeon general, has been nominated as the new CDC chief
The White House has nominated Erica Schwartz to succeed Jay Bhattacharya, the acting CDC chief since February. Bhattacharya took over after the previous director was dismissed in 2025.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The White House has chosen Erica Schwartz, a former Navy doctor, to head the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. She previously held the role of deputy surgeon general during the initial Trump administration and served as a rear admiral and chief medical officer in the U.S. Coast Guard.
“It is my Honor to nominate the incredibly talented Dr. Erica Schwartz,” President Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, praising her as a “STAR!” He also announced the appointments of two senior officials to the CDC and another to the Department of Health and Human Services.
Schwartz’s nomination will likely focus on the CDC’s vaccine decision-making during Senate hearings. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., dismissed the previous CDC head, Susan Monarez, after less than a month in office last August. Monarez claims her dismissal was due to her opposition to Kennedy’s vaccine policy overhaul. Since then, various HHS officials, including the National Institutes of Health director Jay Bhattacharya, have temporarily led the agency.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Should she be confirmed by the Senate, Schwartz will lead the CDC following a turbulent year marked by leadership resignations, loss of expertise, and a violent incident in August where a gunman fired nearly 500 bullets at its headquarters, resulting in the death of a police officer. As of last March, bullet holes were still visible at the CDC.
Schwartz’s approach to public health policy remains uncertain. In the Coast Guard, she spearheaded health initiatives, including vaccination drives for anthrax and smallpox, and developed policies for HIV and biological weapons responses. She also played a key role in the Ebola outbreak response and was a pandemic influenza expert. Schwartz holds a medical degree, a master’s in public health, and a law degree from the University of Maryland.
Georges C. Benjamin, CEO of the American Public Health Association, emphasized Schwartz’s qualifications, stating that her medical and public health expertise aligns with the CDC’s mission to be guided by evidence-based science. He expressed eagerness to collaborate with her to enhance national health outcomes.
The Trump administration has recently sought to moderate RFK, Jr.’s anti-vaccine rhetoric, which has alienated voters, by adopting a “low-risk messaging diet” ahead of midterm elections, according to Bloomberg. Schwartz, known for supporting vaccines, may represent a cautious choice for the CDC leadership. Her nomination follows the delayed confirmation of wellness influencer Casey Means for U.S. surgeon general, sparked by Means’ evasive stance on vaccines during her Senate hearing. The White House’s support for Means has reportedly wavered in recent weeks.
At a House Committee on Appropriations hearing, RFK, Jr., backed Means, describing her as “not a political person,” and urged the Senate to confirm her. He also voiced support for the CDC director nominee to restore the agency’s direction.
Editor’s Note (4/16/26): This story is in development and may be updated.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
