Ministers are anticipated to announce a third educational pathway in addition to A-levels and T-levels in an upcoming skills white paper.
Ministers are expected to outline a third pathway alongside A-levels and T-levels in a forthcoming skills white paper.
New âV-levelâ qualifications, intended to complement A-levels and T-levels, are reportedly in development, according to Schools Week.
Multiple insiders indicate that ministers are preparing to unveil a new range of vocational qualifications in an upcoming white paper focused on post-16 education and skills.
This decision follows nearly ten years of intense discussion surrounding vocational and technical choices available to school leavers.
In 2020, the government introduced âgold-standardâ T-levels, simultaneously phasing out applied general qualifications (AGQs) like BTECs to steer students toward T-levels.
Colleges have urged both the previous Conservative government and the current Labour government to sustain a third route that effectively merges practical skills with academic education.
Advocates from the Protect Student Choice initiative, led by the Sixth Form Colleges Association, have cautioned that abolishing AGQs could result in a âqualifications gapâ impacting thousands of students for whom T-levels are either unsuitable or unavailable.
Well-regarded AGQs like BTECs in areas such as health and social care, applied science, and IT are slated for discontinuation in 2026, with respected AGQs in business and engineering expected to follow by 2027.
Last year saw over 277,000 students enrolled in AGQs, in contrast to just 41,500 in T-levels. The Protect Student Choice campaign cautioned that the elimination of these courses ârisks reversing recent strides made in improving access to higher education, and could lead to a rise in young individuals not engaged in education, employment, or training (NEET).â
Ministerial Indications
Earlier this year, the independent review of curriculum and assessment led by Professor Becky Francis suggested evaluating âwhat level 3 qualifications may need to exist alongside T-levels to ensure a simplified, high-quality offering that addresses the needs of all learners.â
The interim report from the review noted it was âapparentâ that T-levels âcannot serve as the sole technical/vocational optionâ due to various reasons, such as the potentially high entry barriers set by providers, program design challenges, and the limited number of young people, aged 16, who feel confident about their career paths.
The final report by Francis is expected to be released shortly, potentially shaping forthcoming white papers on education and post-16 learning.
During the Labour Party conference, Skills Minister Jacqui Smith suggested further revelations related to this matter.
When queried by FE Week whether funding cuts for 2026 and 2027 were finalized, she replied, âIâve made it clear that T-levels play a significant role. A-levels are essential as well. We require a third route that bridges the gap.â
She added, âWe will elaborate on this, and it will offer various options for those looking to preserve what they currently have.â
Several sources disclosed to FE Week that V-levels would comprise this âthird route,â though specific details regarding qualification scope, content, assessment, and funding are not yet available.
The Department for Education did not provide a response to requests for comments.
V for Vocational
A source from the government indicated that V-levels would be positioned as âsector-specificâ qualifications designed to accompany T-levels, which are described as âoccupationally-specific.â
They explained, âHowever, we aim to ensure that this is not perceived as a lesser pathway. We desire all options to maintain a similar quality of provision, regardless of variations in assessment strategies or content.â
Since the 2016 Sainsbury Review recommended a streamlined framework of A-levels and technical qualifications, level 3 reform has emerged as a significant point of contention in education policy.
T-levels were launched by the previous government in 2020 and have continued to receive endorsements from current Labour officials. The development and implementation of T-levels have incurred roughly ÂŁ1.8 billion, but they have faced criticism for high dropout rates and overly ambitious enrollment expectations.
Another informant told FE Week, âSchools, colleges, and educators are eager for clarity regarding post-16 level 3 pathways. A unified menu consisting of A-levels, T-levels, and V-levels makes sense, but we need to ascertain what distinctive offerings V-levels will present and how they surpass current level 3 alternatives.â
Chief Education Officer (Deputy CEO)
Romero Catholic Academy Trust
Director of Academy Finance and Operations
Ormiston Academies Trust
Principal & Chief Executive
Truro & Penwith College
Group Director of Marketing, Communications & External Engagement
London & South East Education Group
Sponsored posts
Subscribe
Become a subscriber and stay informed with the latest news and discussions in the industry.
Your thoughts