A 19-year-old woman talks with nurse Valeria Zafisoa at a traveling contraception clinic in eastern Madagascar run by the British nonprofit group MSI Reproductive Choices. That group lost $15 million in funding the last time Trump enforced the Mexico City policy.
Samantha Reinders for NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Samantha Reinders for NPR
For more than four decades, U.S. presidents have implemented and reversed policies regarding funding for organizations that provide or advocate for abortion. At the recent March for Life rally in Washington, D.C., Vice President JD Vance announced an expansion of the Mexico City policy that will now also restrict funding to groups promoting “gender ideology” and diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Vance stated, “We believe that every country has a responsibility to protect life. We are expanding this policy to safeguard life and combat DEI and radical gender ideologies that target our children.”
The policy will now extend beyond non-governmental charitable organizations to larger entities operating across borders, such as U.N. agencies.
The announcement at the March for Life event was well-received by participants, while some expressed concerns about the potential impact of the expanded policy. Elyssa Koren of ADF International praised the move, emphasizing the importance of ensuring U.S. tax dollars do not support abortion internationally, while Keifer Buckingham of the Council for Global Equality criticized the policy for potentially hindering access to healthcare for marginalized groups.
Understanding the Mexico City Policy
The Mexico City policy, established in 1984 by President Ronald Reagan, initially targeted U.S. funds allocated for family planning and prohibited support to organizations involved in abortion-related activities. The rule has been repealed and reinstated by different administrations over the years, with the Trump administration expanding its scope to cover all foreign aid for global health.
The reinstatement of the policy last year significantly impacted MSI Reproductive Choices, resulting in a loss of $15 million in funding and leading to service cutbacks in countries like Zimbabwe. The recent policy expansion raises concerns about its potential effects on reproductive care access and the broader implications for international aid programs.
Anticipated Impacts of the New Policy
The expanded policy is expected to impact a wider range of foreign aid programs, including non-military assistance exceeding $30 billion. The inclusion of multilateral organizations and foreign governments under the policy’s purview raises concerns about potential limitations on healthcare services and humanitarian responses.
Furthermore, the policy’s extension to restrict activities related to “gender ideology” and diversity, equity, and inclusion has raised alarms among advocacy groups. The potential implications for healthcare services to transgender individuals and marginalized populations remain a point of contention.
The exact ramifications of the policy will depend on the forthcoming guidelines and enforcement mechanisms. Advocates fear that organizations may alter their operations to align with the policy’s restrictions, potentially impacting the delivery of essential services.
“They have to choose, and may make choices that are not based in science, not based in public health, because they’re trying to preserve some semblance of their work,” says Buckingham. “We fear people will do that first.”
