Commentary
In the early hours of June 13, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a historic air campaign involving over 200 fighter jets. This calculated assault targeted more than 100 sites across Iran, unleashing over 330 munitions. The Natanz Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, crucial for housing around 1,700 IR4 and IR6 centrifuges capable of enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels, suffered extensive damage. Additional strikes hit nuclear facilities in Esfahan, Arak, Fordow, Parchin, and several IRGC bases—a meticulously orchestrated effort aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear aspirations.
However, not every stronghold succumbed; the Fordow facility, deeply entrenched beneath layers of rock, remains unscathed, raising a pivotal question in Washington: should the United States deploy its GBU57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, a hefty 15-ton bunker-buster designed for such hardened targets?
When Precision Strikes Collide With Political Calculus
Iran retaliated with a volley of over 150 ballistic missiles and 100 drones aimed at Israeli territories. The Iron Dome and allied air defenses successfully intercepted most of these threats, resulting in only minor but symbolically significant damage. U.S. intelligence revealed that Iran expended nearly a quarter of its missile inventory—initially estimated at 2,000 to 3,000—within just a few days, highlighting its diminishing military capacity.
President Trump, who previously set a 60-day deadline for Iran to limit its nuclear activities, now finds himself at a crossroads. According to The Wall Street Journal, he has privately green-lit military options, including U.S. strikes, yet maintains a careful public stance—supporting Israel through missile defense measures and military positioning while withholding definitive orders. This approach reflects a calculated mindset; Trump appears more inclined to avoid failure than to rush into action, ready to engage decisively only if he can assure meaningful outcomes.
Bunkers, Bombs, and the Burden of What Comes Next
While the dispatch of bunker-busters is one task, the real challenge lies in contemplating the aftermath. If a U.S. strike were to obliterate the Fordow facility, what would fill the void left behind?
One optimistic narrative suggests the return of Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the Shah, as a transitional leader. A reformer with connections to moderate expatriates, Pahlavi could potentially lay the groundwork for a pro-Western government and economic revival, perhaps even fostering regional peace akin to the Abraham Accords. Yet, one must tread cautiously; history teaches us that the ousting of Saddam Hussein led Iraq into chaos, spawning sectarian violence and the rise of ISIS, alongside increased Iranian influence—a sobering reminder of the potential consequences of removing authoritarian regimes. Unlike Iraq, which was a newly forged state, Iran has a long-standing historical and institutional coherence.
Nevertheless, signs of strain are apparent: mass evacuations in Tehran, an economy grappling with sanctions and domestic unrest, and a ruling elite visibly shaken by losses in Natanz and beyond—these factors could breed armed militias, some possibly controlling nuclear-capable materials, which raises concerns about potential “dirty bombs” threatening global security.
From Shadows to Sky: Israel’s Intelligence Masterstroke
The brilliance of Operation Rising Lion lies not just in its tactical execution but in the intelligence framework that supports it. Years of groundwork culminated in this moment; Mossad operatives planted explosive drones, compromised radar systems, and guided payloads into Iranian territory—a strategy aptly described by Bloomberg as “hybrid warfare par excellence.” Establishing a drone base believed to be within Iran’s central provinces allowed for precise targeting of missile launchers and air defenses.
Advanced platforms such as F-15I Ra’am “Thunder” fighters equipped with 2,000-pound bunker-busters complemented stealth missions conducted by F35I Adir jets, all backed by mid-air refueling and sophisticated Israeli targeting systems. The fusion of human intelligence, cyber warfare, drones, and manned aircraft has redefined the parameters of modern precision warfare.
Hidden Costs: China’s Billion-Dollar Middle East Investment
As geopolitical tensions rise, Beijing observes not from a distance but with deep investment interests. The 25-year strategic partnership between China and Iran, established in March 2021 and valued at $300–400 billion, ties China to ongoing investments across Iran’s energy, telecommunications, transportation, and potentially military sectors.
For China, Iran serves multiple strategic roles: a source of sanctioned oil (allowing the CCP to procure oil at reduced rates), a foothold in Middle Eastern geopolitics, and a tool for distracting and dividing Western powers. If Iran’s regime collapses entirely, Beijing loses that leverage; however, if the nation fractures, China stands to exploit the chaos and establish new footholds, reminiscent of its maneuvers following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.
America’s Crossroads: Strategy Over Showmanship
The gravest error would be to regard impending U.S. actions as a mere tactical military strike. The stakes are far greater than the excitement of dropping bombs; they hinge on strategic foresight. U.S. planners must consider: Do we have a concrete political strategy? Are we prepared to guide governance in a post-strike landscape? Are our allies and the international community aligned on plans for reconstruction or transitional stability? Most critically, how do we prevent China from capitalizing on the aftermath?
These questions are not mere hypotheticals; they form the strategic blueprint for contemporary interventions. One can assume that over the past week, the U.S. administration has been diligently crafting scenarios and engaging with allies to address these urgent issues.
Conclusion: Legacy Wears the Blueprint, Not the Bomb
The impending decision—whether to deploy bunker-busters against Fordow—will reverberate for generations. A purely kinetic triumph that lacks a follow-up strategy risks transforming tactical success into a strategic blunder. Even worse, it could inadvertently empower Beijing at a moment when the West is striving to curtail its expansion.
President Trump—or any future American leader—stands at a pivotal juncture: yes, strike the targets, but also craft a vision for Iran’s next chapter. Victory devoid of vision is an empty victory. Only with a dual approach can today’s mission evolve into a lasting legacy.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
If you found this article interesting, please consider supporting traditional journalism
Our first edition was published 25 years ago from a basement in Atlanta. Today, The Epoch Times brings fact-based, award-winning journalism to millions of Americans.
Our journalists have been threatened, arrested, and assaulted, but our commitment to independent journalism has never wavered. This year marks our 25th year of independent reporting, free from corporate and political influence.
That’s why you’re invited to a limited-time introductory offer — just $1 per week — so you can join millions already celebrating independent news.
