In a recent exploration of the ‘No Kings’ protests, Bill O’Reilly and his team assert that these demonstrations were premeditated rather than spontaneous, having been orchestrated months in advance.
This assertion is not surprising, particularly given the theatrical flair often exhibited by left-leaning movements—it’s almost as if they have a script.
What’s truly fascinating is the media’s enthusiastic promotion of this movement, seemingly oblivious to the public’s memories of how they covered the Tea Party.
In the video below, O’Reilly articulates:
Some claim this is the largest mass demonstration in American history, but that’s simply not accurate. The protests against the Vietnam War were significantly larger and, importantly, they were organic. They weren’t orchestrated by interest groups as the ‘No Kings’ protests were.
This distinction is crucial. The Vietnam War demonstrations arose from genuine public concern and anger, while the current anti-Trump sentiment appears to be manufactured. It’s true that there are millions who oppose Trump, but let’s delve into the origins of this particular protest. I must credit Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna from Florida, who has uncovered some intriguing insights. A key player behind the ‘No Kings’ initiative, organized three months ago—not spontaneously—is Christy Walton, heir to the Walmart empire, who has invested millions into this endeavor. The organization receiving this funding is known as ‘Indivisible,’ a progressive group that is aptly named after the Pledge of Allegiance.
Indivisible has received substantial financial backing from various sources, which we will detail, and they coordinated this protest four months prior to Trump’s presidency, when he was barely in office.
O’Reilly further mentions the involvement of George Soros, which, unsurprisingly, adds another layer to this narrative.
For a deeper understanding, watch the full segment below:
This is the critical information that mainstream media is neglecting to share with the public, as they focus on glorifying these protests as a celebration of ‘our democracy.’
