Monday, 3 Aug 2026
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • VIDEO
  • man
  • Trumps
  • Season
  • star
  • Years
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Health and Wellness > Wearable tech returns results of varying accuracy for fitness metrics: Study
Health and Wellness

Wearable tech returns results of varying accuracy for fitness metrics: Study

Last updated: June 3, 2025 6:34 pm
Share
Wearable tech returns results of varying accuracy for fitness metrics: Study
SHARE

Wearable technology has become increasingly popular in recent years, with many Americans relying on devices like Apple Watches to track their fitness goals. However, a new study from the University of Mississippi has found that these devices may not be as accurate as users think.

Professor Minsoo Kang and doctoral student Ju-Pil Choe reviewed 56 studies comparing the Apple Watch to other trusted tools for measuring energy burned, heart rate, and step counts. The researchers found that while Apple Watches are generally accurate when measuring heart rate and step counts, they are less reliable when it comes to measuring energy expenditure.

The study, published in the journal Physiological Measurement, showed that the mean absolute percent errors for heart rate and step counts were 4.43% and 8.17%, respectively, while the error for energy expenditure was as high as 27.96%. This inaccuracy was observed across all types of users and activities tested, including walking, running, cycling, and mixed-intensity workouts.

Kang and Choe emphasize that while Apple Watches can be useful tools for tracking basic activity and staying motivated, users should not rely on the data as completely accurate. They caution against using the devices to make decisions about workouts or medical conditions, as the numbers may be off and lead to confusion or overtraining.

The researchers also noted that newer models of Apple Watches appear to be more accurate, indicating that the technology is improving over time. Kang hopes that this study will help consumers make informed decisions about using wearable devices and encourage manufacturers to continue refining the technology.

See also  Sugar, fat and salt on the rise in US breakfast cereals, study shows

By identifying the weaknesses in current wearable technology, Kang and Choe believe that developers can receive valuable feedback to design better sensors and algorithms. This, in turn, can make wearable devices more useful for both everyday users and healthcare providers.

Overall, while Apple Watches and similar devices can be helpful for tracking fitness goals and staying motivated, it is essential for users to understand their limitations and use the data as a guide rather than a definitive measure of their health and fitness. As technology continues to advance, wearable devices may become more accurate and reliable tools for monitoring health metrics.

TAGGED:accuracyfitnessmetricsResultsreturnsStudyTechvaryingWearable
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Meghan Markle Left ‘Humiliated and Rattled’ By Brooke Shields’ Dig Meghan Markle Left ‘Humiliated and Rattled’ By Brooke Shields’ Dig
Next Article The best electric bike accessories for 2025, tested and reviewed The best electric bike accessories for 2025, tested and reviewed
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Popular Posts

Federal troop deployments to US cities cost taxpayers $496M and counting

By FATIMA HUSSEIN The deployment of federal troops to six U.S. cities by the Trump…

January 28, 2026

10 Art Shows to See in Los Angeles This January

The art scene in Los Angeles is buzzing with excitement as the new year kicks…

January 5, 2026

Scotiabank Updates Midstream Views, Raises Enterprise Products (EPD) Target

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE:EPD) has recently been highlighted as one of the "14 Under-the-Radar…

March 20, 2026

‘Acapulco’ to End With Season 4 at Apple TV+, Sets Release Date

Apple TV+’s “Acapulco” to Conclude with Season 4 After a successful run, the comedy series…

May 6, 2025

‘We Were Liars’ Creators on Book to Show Changes, Deaths and Season 2

From the very beginning, the adaptation of E. Lockhart's "We Were Liars" into a series…

June 20, 2025

You Might Also Like

Healthy until proven sick: Medicaid work rules threaten patient care
Health and Wellness

Healthy until proven sick: Medicaid work rules threaten patient care

August 2, 2026
Cathie Wood sells .5 million of surging tech stock
Economy

Cathie Wood sells $5.5 million of surging tech stock

August 2, 2026
A Doctor Fact Checks Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s CNN Interview
Health and Wellness

A Doctor Fact Checks Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s CNN Interview

August 2, 2026
Samsung’s Huge 2027 Galaxy Lineup Would be a Big Gamble – Tech Advisor
Tech and Science

Samsung’s Huge 2027 Galaxy Lineup Would be a Big Gamble – Tech Advisor

August 2, 2026
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?